Chlorinating drinking water helps reduce pathogens, but it can also form potentially carcinogenic byproducts, e.g., haloacetic acids (HAAs), dalapon, and bromate [1,2]. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the EU set a maximum contamination limit for the sum of five HAAs (HAA5: MCAA, MBAA, DCAA, DBAA, TCAA) of 60 parts per billion (60 µg/L) [3]. EPA Method 557 describes their quantification in the μg/L range in a wide variety of water types [4]. Here, the analysis is accomplished with a Metrohm ion chromatograph (IC) coupled to a triple quadrupole Agilent mass spectrometer (MS). This sensitive method requires no sample extraction, and the Metrohm Suppressor Module eliminates any eluent interferences. Analytes are well-resolved from matrix components with the Metrosep A Supp 19 column. Matrix spike recoveries for 1 µg/L of all analytes were between 65–115% even in heavily loaded water samples. Minimum reporting levels (MRL) were 0.025−0.25 µg/L. The presented IC-MS/MS method fulfills all requirements of EPA Method 557.
Water samples included tap water (from eastern Switzerland) and mineral water (Evian containing c(hydrogen carbonate) = 360 mg/L, c(sulfate) = 14 mg/L, c(chloride) = 10 mg/L, and c(nitrate) = 3.8 mg/L). Additionally, the laboratory synthetic sample matrix (LSSM) according to EPA 557 (c(ammonium chloride) = 100 mg/L, c(nitrate) = 20 mg/L, c(hydrogen carbonate) = 150 mg/L, c(chloride) = 250 mg/L, and c(sulfate) = 250 mg/L) was analyzed. Samples were stabilized with 0.1% methanol (v/v) and cooled to 4 °C. Internal standards were added at a concentration of 4 µg/L (here: MCAA-13C and MBA-13C).
The hyphenation of HPLC with mass spectrometry has commonly focused on the study of organic molecules. Hyphenating ion chromatography (IC) with mass spectrometry (MS) opens up the field to highly sensitive analysis of ionic and more polar substances in aqueous solutions or salt-containing matrices. Using the 889 IC Sample Center − cool guarantees stable and reproducible sample processing at 4 °C (Figure 1) by preventing the decay of the degradation-sensitive HAAs.
The metal-free microbore ion chromatograph 940 Professional IC Vario with a Metrosep A Supp 19 column, sequential suppression, and an IC Conductivity Detector MB accomplished chromatographic separation without any interferences and a reduced void volume. Sensitive and selective detection of haloacetic acids was carried out with an Agilent 6475 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS equipped with an Agilent Jet Stream Technology Ion Source, operated in dynamic multiple reaction monitoring (dMRM) acquisition mode. Conductivity detection can be used to quantify common anions like fluoride, chloride, nitrate, or sulfate in parallel. An additional Dosino enables direct infusion of standard solutions to the MS for method optimization, i.e., finding the best MS parameters to detect the analytes of interest.
The 948 Continuous IC Module, CEP precisely produces a potassium hydroxide eluent in concentrations from 15−100 mmol/L potassium hydroxide (KOH) (Figure 2). The IC was operated with the software MagIC Net, and the MS by MassHunter software. Synchronization of both instruments was controlled via a remote cable. Table 1 lists the most important instrument settings.
IC Column | Metrosep A Supp 19 - 150/4.0 |
---|---|
Eluent/gradient | 15−100 mmol/L KOH + 10% methanol |
Flow rate | 0.5 mL/min |
Column temperature | 15 °C |
Injection volume | 100 μL |
Suppression | sequential |
Ion polarity | negative |
Gas flow | 12 L/min |
Sheath gas flow | 12 L/min |
Gas temperature | 150 °C |
Sheath gas temperature | 245 °C |
Detection | dMRM (dynamic Multiple Reaction Monitoring) |
The presented method is capable of determining all relevant haloacetic acids, bromate, and dalapon in drinking water according to EPA 557 (Table 2). Separation on the column Metrosep A Supp 19 - 150/4.0 with a hydroxide eluent was robust and reproducible. This combination enabled sufficient resolution between highly concentrated matrix peaks (i.e., chloride, nitrate, bicarbonate, and sulfate) and the analytes (Figure 3). The matrix was diverted to the waste to avoid ion suppression in the MS. A further advantage of this setup is the solvent-stable suppressor. Using 10% methanol in the eluent helps the transfer from aqueous to gas phase and has no impact on the suppressor. Thus, no further post-column addition of organic solvents with a secondary pump was necessary to improve evaporation of analytes in the MS.
Calibration from 0.1−40 µg/L with quadratic fits resulted in R2 values in the range of 0.996−0.999. Determination of the lowest concentration minimum reporting levels (LCMRL) was done as per EPA 557, chapter 9.2.4 (Table 2). Seven replicates were successfully analyzed for the upper and lower PIR (prediction interval of results) limit (acceptable range 50–150%).
Water samples were directly analyzed (no dilution needed). Table 3 shows that spiking recoveries of 1 µg/L were in the range of 65−115% (for LSSM), 46−112% (for tap water), and 87−150% (for Evian water). Replicates for tap water (n = 7) were in the range of 0.7−6.8% RSD (relative standard deviation). For mineral water (Evian) (n = 6) and for LSSM (n = 7) RSD values were in the range of 1.6−6.3% and 1.0−36.5%, respectively. Most values were ≤5%, except for TCAA (which elutes close to sulfate).
Critical pairs were DBA/nitrate and TCAA/sulfate. The diverter windows must be accurately set to acquire complete data for the analytes DBAA and TCAA and divert both nitrate and sulfate to the waste. Sample degradation at room temperature was visible after one day and considerable degradation occurred after four to five days. The samples must be measured in a timely manner or a sampler with cooling function must be used (e.g., 889 IC Sample Center – cool). A Metrohm CO2-suppressor (MCS) was used in this setup as it improved the conductivity background and hence reduced the number of interfering ions in the MS.
Analyte | Abbreviation | Retention time [min] | Precursor m/z | Product m/z | Concentration for minimum reporting level [μg/L] |
PIR limits [%] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monochloroacetic acid |
MCAA | 15.8 | 93 | 34.9 | 0.025* | 91−109 |
Monobromoacetic acid | MBAA | 17.2 | 137 | 79 | 0.025* | 88−112 |
Bromate | BrO3 | 16.7 | 127 | 111 | 0.025* | 84−116 |
Dichloroacetic acid | DCAA | 25.6 | 127 | 83 | 0.025 | 84−116 |
Dalapon | DAL | 28.0 | 141 | 97 | 0.025 | 74−126 |
Bromochloroacetic acid | BCAA | 28.0 | 173 | 81 | 0.05 | 74−126 |
Dibromoacetic acid | DBAA | 31.4 | 217 | 173 | 0.025 | 75−125 |
Trichloroacetic acid | TCAA | 37.9 | 161 | 117 | 0.25 | 62−131 |
Bromodichloroacetic acid | BDCAA | 40.2 | 163 | 81 | 0.025 | 79−121 |
Chlorodibromoacetic acid | CDBAA | 43.5 | 207 | 79 | 0.025 | 52−148 |
Tribromoacetic acid | TBAA | 49.1 | 251 | 79 | 0.025 | 62−138 |
Analyte | Concentration [μg/L] in samples spiked with 1 μg/L of all analytes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Tap water (eastern Switzerland) | Mineral water (Evian) | LSSM (EPA 557) | |
MCAA | 1.12 | 1.41 | 1.15 |
MBAA | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.87 |
BrO3- | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.84 |
DCAA | 0.88 | 1.03 | 0.80 |
DAL | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.76 |
BCAA | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.71 |
DBAA | 0.88 | 1.22 | 0.79 |
TCAA | 0.46 | 1.50 | 0.65 |
BDCAA | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
CDBAA | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.88 |
TBAA | 0.88 | 1.43 | 0.84 |
The presented method fulfills all analytical requirements of US EPA 557 [4]. The robust setup of hyphenating Metrohm IC and Agilent MS guarantees the highest sensitivity and selectivity for all relevant haloacetic acids, dalapon, and bromate, even in complex drinking water matrices. The five representative substances (mono-, di-, and trichloroacetic acid, and mono- and dibromoacetic acid) were precisely quantified in the sub μg/L concentration range for various water samples. The requirements of EPA 557 [4] and the EU directive [5] are met with this method.
- Zhao, H.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; et al. Environmental Occurrence and Risk Assessment of Haloacetic Acids in Swimming Pool Water and Drinking Water. RSC Adv 10 (47), 28267–28276. DOI:10.1039/d0ra02389b
- Sinha, R.; Gupta, A. K.; Ghosal, P. S. A Review on Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids in Drinking Water: Global Status, Health Impact, Insights of Control and Removal Technologies. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2021, 9 (6), 106511. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2021.106511
- US EPA, O. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations (accessed 2022-09-19).
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 557: Determination of Haloacetic Acids, Bromate, and Dalapon in Drinking Water by Ion Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (IC-ESI-MS/MS). EPA Document No. 815-B-09-012 2009.
- Directive - 2020/2184 - EN - EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2020/2184/oj (accessed 2024-03-11).